This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat dot com>
- To: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>
- Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:07:16 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- References: <5141EF6D dot 9000601 at redhat dot com> <514334DF dot 8000306 at redhat dot com> <51434336 dot 3020103 at redhat dot com> <20130321105823 dot GA29635 at www5 dot open-std dot org>
- Reply-to: myllynen at redhat dot com
On 2013-03-21 12:58, Keld Simonsen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:50:14AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 03/15/2013 10:49 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2013 11:40 AM, Marko Myllynen wrote:
>>>> attached is a patch to define yesstr/nostr in fi_FI (as "Kyllä" and
>>>> "Ei", obviously). I happened to notice BZ #15264 so this is related
>>>> but definitely does not warrant closing it so I chose to omit the
>>>> reference from the ChangeLog entry.
>>>> 2013-03-14 Marko Myllynen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>>> * locales/fi_FI (LC_MESSAGES): Define yesstr, nostr.
> Could I see the full patch? Why is this not on email@example.com ?
libc-locales was not not CC'ed because of an oversight, the full patch
can be found from the libc-alpha archives: