This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [attention machine maintainers] [PATCH] <math.h> issignaling
- From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
- To: thomas at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:39:45 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [attention machine maintainers] [PATCH] <math.h> issignaling
- References: <87r4j73cqo dot fsf at schwinge dot name> <20130324 dot 173033 dot 2124715003552827287 dot davem at davemloft dot net> <87mwts2cpc dot fsf at schwinge dot name>
From: Thomas Schwinge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:52:31 +0100
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:30:33 -0400, David Miller <email@example.com> wrote:
>> From: Thomas Schwinge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:17:19 +0100
>> > I have now pushed a new version of this patch in the
>> > tschwinge/issignaling branch. Would machine maintainers please test
>> > this branch/patch and report back?
>> It doesn't even build on sparc because the code block that is
>> CPP enabled in the ldbl-128 version of issignaling() has
>> an #error in it.
> Yes, because that code has not yet been tested, as the #error says --
> sorry for not telling that in advance. Do you want me to publish a new
> branch and/or patch with that line removed?
With the #error line removed, sparc builds cleanly and there are no
I tested with 32-bit sparc V9, which is generally very harmonious with
64-bit sparc. But I'll kick off a 64-bit build as well and let you
know if anything turns up.