This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: myllynen at redhat dot com, Keld dot Simonsen at dkuug dot dk
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:49:03 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- References: <5141EF6D.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On 03/14/2013 11:40 AM, Marko Myllynen wrote:
> attached is a patch to define yesstr/nostr in fi_FI (as "KyllÃ" and
> "Ei", obviously). I happened to notice BZ #15264 so this is related
> but definitely does not warrant closing it so I chose to omit the
> reference from the ChangeLog entry.
> 2013-03-14 Marko Myllynen <email@example.com>
> * locales/fi_FI (LC_MESSAGES): Define yesstr, nostr.
This looks good to me, could you do me a favour?
(a) Include in a comment the unicode values of yesstr/nostr, this makes
review easier for future readers.
% yesstr/nostr KyllÃ/Ei
(b) Can you build the library to make sure the locale is compiled correctly
and without error?
I've included Keld in the TO since as the author of the locale it would
be nice if he could comment on the change.
After review, and once we checkin your changes you should update the BZ
to indicate you've fixed fi_FI.