This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Create nptl manual node and document thread_local limitation
On 14 March 2013 08:41, Carlos O'Donell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> No, make it just "threads". We want to use "POSIX threads", "threads",
> or the name of the function. I'd like to avoid the term pthread, and
> NPTL unless specifically talking about "pthread_*" functions or
> defining "Native POSIX Thread Library" and talking directly about
> the implementation.
> Does that make sense?
OK, I'll make those changes and push the patch later today.