This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Optimize strchr (x, 0)
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:39 PM, OndÅej BÃlka <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:48:02PM +0600, Denis Zaitceff wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OndÅej BÃlka <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > As strlen is more optimized than rawmemchr it will be more effective
>> > than now. (If rawmemchr(x,0) is faster then it is performance regression of
>> > strlen.)
>> Why do you think it is more optimized?
> Test it. If you find architecture where rawmemchr/strchr is faster feel
> free send patch like:
> size_t strlen(char *x)
> return strchr(x,0)-x;
Ok. What exactly should I test - strlen and strchar from where?
GCC's variants, ones from string2.h or manual asm-variants?