This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: asm syntax
ok. point taken. I'll stick with at&t syntax. fyi, I've no background
in windows/dos programming, just find intel syntax much cleaner and I
began with yasm on linux.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Rich Felker <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 04:08:13PM +0000, Kenneth O'Brien wrote:
>> I am working on SSE4.2 enchanced string functions. Are there any
>> objections to writing new assembly code in Intel syntax over AT&T.
>> All current asm(that I've seen) is written in AT&T, but gas supports
>> Intel which (IMHO) is friendlier to the programmer.
> s/friendlier to the programmer/friendlier to a programmer with a DOS
> or Windows background/