This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Should undefined symbols in sysv hash table be ignored in do_lookup_x?


> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, while the linker putting other SHN_UNDEF symbols in the hash table
> > would be a linker bug if it happened (since the only purpose of the hash
> > table is for symbol table entries that might need to be looked up by name),
> > I don't think we would or should consider it a violation of the format.
> > So the treatment of symbol table entries should be completely identical
> > regardless of which hash table format was involved in locating them.
> 
> Since there are no SHN_UNDEF TLS symbols in gnu hash table,
> we don't need to check it in check_match.  We only need to check
> it for sysv hash table:

You seem to have completely ignored what I said.
Was it unclear in some way?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]