This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Should undefined symbols in sysv hash table be ignored in do_lookup_x?
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Roland McGrath <email@example.com> wrote:
>> before that code. Since undefined symbol has st_value == 0, we
>> will only see it with TLS symbols. Since most of relocations against
>> TLS symbols are treated PLT relocations, we will return NULL for
>> undefined TLS symbols, except for SIZE relocations against TLS
> That sounds like a "yes", albeit far less clear.
> So you can demonstrate it with a test case using SIZE reloc types.
> It may not be worth the trouble to get that case into the test suite
> now, since it requires unreleased binutils to build the test and that
> would necessitate configure checks and all that. But you should at
> least write up the test case and post it.
> Before we make a change for this reason, it should have a bugzilla report
> filed and the test case attached there.