This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Implement x86 SIZE32/SIZE64 relocations


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:10:28AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:32:54PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >> I checked x86 size relocation support into binutils and
>> >> pushed it to master branch in glibc.
>> >
>> > Please revert it, this should have never been a dynamic relocation.
>> >
>>
>> That is not true.  Please see binutils size relocation linker tests.
>> 2 tests scan for run-time size relocation.
>
> You've added a feature that is not really useful for asan, without
> discussing it first.  So we just end up with dead code in both glibc and
> gcc.

First, they aren't dead code. Secondly,  they are specified in the
psABI:

http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/KGyKyS8JaGMawGhL882p

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]