This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3] Fix potential access beyond array bounds in m1np


On 12/28/2012 03:59 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:19:05PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
m remains uninitialized if p >= 18.  The assignment should be moved out
of the condition anyway.


Thanks, here's v3:



diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/mpexp.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/mpexp.c index c5a0283..6d07318 100644 --- a/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/mpexp.c +++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/mpexp.c @@ -71,7 +71,14 @@ __mpexp(mp_no *x, mp_no *y, int p) { for (i=2; i<=p; i++) { if (X[i]!=ZERO) break; } if (i==p+1) { m2--; a *= TWO; } } - if ((m=m1+m2) <= 0) { + + m = m1 + m2; + + /* m1np is used to determine if we could reduce the number of iterations of + the polynomial expansion. We only have data up to precision of 18 and + anything equal to or greater than that will result in an access beyond + array bounds. */ + if (__glibc_unlikely (p < 18 && m <= 0)) {

I would rather have an assert (p < 18) here - or is there a specific reason for not having it?


      m=0;  a=ONE;
      for (i=n-1; i>0; i--,n--) { if (m1np[i][p]+m2>0)  break; }
    }


Andreas

--
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]