This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PING: PATCH: Automatically test IFUNC implementations

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: Automatically test IFUNC implementations
References: <CAMe9rOoktiz4=dSHSySnXQRywVRNF7Jbxrda6Hy3=TvZ4WgkFQ@mail.gmail.com><20121005224749.1A95A2C0B7@topped-with-meat.com><20121006165928.GA516@gmail.com><20121009203045.E04FA2C0A2@topped-with-meat.com><20121010145624.GA13460@gmail.com>

Oh, please add a to-do item somewhere or other about noticing and reporting
func_list elements with !usable.  It may well not be worth trying to do
anything about that before there is a more substantial revamp of the test
infrastructure to feed it into, but it must not be forgotten.


Thanks,
Roland

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PING: PATCH: Automatically test IFUNC implementations
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PING: PATCH: Automatically test IFUNC implementations
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PING: PATCH: Automatically test IFUNC implementations
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: PING: PATCH: Automatically test IFUNC implementations
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PING: PATCH: Automatically test IFUNC implementations
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: PING: PATCH: Automatically test IFUNC implementations
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]