This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi! Thanks Andreas and Joseph for the explanations. I now committed Kaz/my patch (we had equal ones apart from the _nl_default_dirname case which I defined to 0x12 as suggested on <http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Testing/Testsuite#ABI_check>, and the __fpscr_values case which I left out for the moment). On Wed, 30 May 2012 16:49:48 +0000, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > fanotify_mark can be found in several syscalls.list files, but not in one > > that SH uses (which might be wrong or might be correct). > > Sounds like a bug in the SH file (if fixing it you'll need to put the > function in the SH Versions file at 2.16, of course). This is listed > separately in each syscalls.list for a 32-bit architecture. Will have a look. > > Additionally, I have a __fpscr_values D 0x8 for GLIBC_2.2 which I also > > yet have to trace down why I have it and you don't. > > You're building a glibc with a Debian-originated patch that adds that > export. I don't claim to understand the reason for that export, however. Will have a look. GrÃÃe, Thomas
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |