This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH #14090] md5_process_block() produces incorrect resultwith large block sizes

On 05/24/2012 06:22 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 05/24/2012 08:11 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Ping, what should be done with these two patches?

Your email had just one patch, which unfortunately was incorrect because it has no effect even on hypothetical hosts with 128-bit size_t, as its expression ((uint64_t) len>> 63>> 1) is always zero.

I just now attached a corrected sha512.c patch to
the report for bug#14090.  The two non-obsolete patches that
are now attached to that bug report should both
be applied, though I hope somebody can test them
first -- I haven't even compiled them, much less
tested them.

I'm asking for both patches - the initial one contains your patch and was tested successfully by me,

 Andreas Jaeger aj@{,} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]