This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
References: <CAMe9rOp=pK6-f5TSJdSZ=+LcH3tKt-AVbgDhV=P78Jueey7b=g@mail.gmail.com><20120518223351.A76872C08B@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOqHapkUDsM2nJ2QqBbazKWi1KRTDw3eONK9uo2RA6s+6A@mail.gmail.com><20120519044947.A37742C083@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOqGBTzOM34yFz-KAw4GeuYXFwtTuZ1RmFEQ3pC9kq3RWA@mail.gmail.com><20120521184338.E254E2C09A@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOqGW+fRhdNVpbXV=QCb8U2fm7fgiogAnbnAqcc5EMaY0Q@mail.gmail.com><20120521200530.2FA442C092@topped-with-meat.com><CAMe9rOpVrGWJwLTmh+yKDKRnTnLZNE03DzwNk5JF6hzAMrMvAA@mail.gmail.com>

> I visually inspected the code and it passed "make check/xcheck".

OK.  So that in all likelihood means we don't have an affirmative test for
the high bits of %rbp being preserved.  But your inspection is enough for me.


Thanks,
Roland

References:
- Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Problem with x32 pointer_guard
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]