This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: RFC: All glibc machine maintainers: Is " RLIM_INFINITY as((__rlim_t) -1)" OK?
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Roland McGrath <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> and I notice that i386 has bit of code encapsulating the rlimit calls
>> which translates between RLIM_INFINITY and "RLIM_INFINITY >> 1" in
>> certain situations.
> It would be nice if someone could research the details and history of that
> (both in libc and on the kernel side) and follow up here for our archived
I think RLIM_INFINITY got changed from signed to unsigned
or something like that.