This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 06:25:50 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I'm like to propose that the minimum Linux kernel version for glibc 2.17 > (the version to be released in December) is 2.6.16 (that is 2.6.16 > release, not 2.6.16-rcN). sounds fine to me > 2.6.16 was the first long-term-stable series of 2.6 kernels, and according > to Wikipedia ceased to be maintained in July 2009; I don't think anything > older than it is relevant for glibc 2.17. As well as allowing various > __ASSUME_* conditionals to be cleaned up that could not be cleaned up if > only 2.6.0 or 2.6.1 were required, requiring at least 2.6.16 would allow > removing all the specific kernel version references in the README file. i would prefer to keep the version checking in the features header accurate. seems like the cost is already sunk, and removing them doesn't really gain anything ? we use this header verbatim in uClibc, so it'd be nice to not have to fork it ... -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |