This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCHv3] BZ#13750: Do not build manual in the source directory

On 05/02/2012 10:49 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Andreas Jaeger<> wrote:
On 04/26/2012 05:09 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

Here's a updated patch to build the manual in the build directory and
not anymore in the source directory.

Tested with make;make info pdf html;make install;make clean

Ok to commit?

Ping, is this ok to commit?

The patch is moving us in the right direction e.g. don't build in the source directory.

I have only done a cursory review of the patch, but I trust that if
you built it and tested it and nothing broke that it's fine. We can
fix any cosmetic makefile bike-shedding issues at a later date.

Have you reviewed how binutils and gdb do this or are they still
building the manuals in the source tree? I remember fixing html/pdf
builds for all the toolchain projects for CodeSourcery, and I remember
ignoring this issue.

GCC builds the manual in the build dir, binutils as well (in a doc subdir),

Please check this in on Friday if nobody else disagrees with me :-)

will do, thanks,

 Andreas Jaeger aj@{,} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]