This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix for logb/logbf/logbl (bz 13954/13955/13956)
From: Andreas Jaeger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:15:51 +0200
> On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 22:07:00 Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> On 05/01/2012 09:38 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> >> What about the dbl-64/wordsize-64, ldbl-96 and ldbl-128 routines? Do
>> >> they have the same problem and need fixing as well?
>> >> Your code change looks fine. Could you check the other
>> >> implementations as well and resubmit then?
>> > I didn't check on above implementation but I'll do.
>> I have added fixes for 'dbl-64/wordsize-64', 'ldbl-96' and 'ldbl-128',
>> although for 'ldbl-128' I could not test (anyone to help me on this?).
>> For 'dbl-64/wordsize-64' I have tested on PPC64 and for 'ldbl-96' on
>> i386 and x86_64.
> grepping Implies for ldbl-128 reveals:
> So, let's ask Dave and Andreas for testing of this patch,
I'll do some sparc testing later tonight.