This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: iconvdata regression

From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
To: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
Cc: ryan dot arnold at gmail dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, tuliom at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:03:59 -0400
Subject: Re: iconvdata regression
References: <20120331.053437.2170377486919118624.davem@redhat.com><CAAKybw8OpYTsXkqe5hHo-kgBqXWEqSUyj92ou-wAJoufVdPkcQ@mail.gmail.com><CADZpyiw-Pimhwwm=3AoiMnBuS7mZREAOkL-WqPnT3Oe4WPjDPQ@mail.gmail.com><20120331.173213.411657149270174548.davem@davemloft.net>

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:32 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:28:04 -0400
>
>> Dave, do you have an opinion here?
>
> Since the revert is easy folks to do locally, I suppose it's not that
> big of a deal if it will be addressed properly on Monday.

Do we agree that build breakage is *much* more serious since it
impacts reg testing?

Cheers,
Carlos.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: iconvdata regression
  - From: David Miller

References:
- iconvdata regression
  - From: David Miller
- Re: iconvdata regression
  - From: Ryan S. Arnold
- Re: iconvdata regression
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: iconvdata regression
  - From: David Miller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]