This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thursday 01 March 2012 15:42:00 Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: >> > The patch is much simpler than the one attached to >> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6528, but requires that >> > a statically-linked binary explicitly list "-lnss_files -lnss_dns >> > -lresolv" on the link line. >> > >> > I *think* Daniel's patch from PR 6528 would not require clients to do >> > that, so perhaps that's better? >> >> As I see it, Daniel's patch has the twin advantages: >> >> * It reduces the amount of code involved in supporting >> --enable-static-nss. >> >> * It makes --enable-static-nss easier to use. >> >> Thus, I'd prefer Daniel's patch. ?What do other people think? > > having more .o's in libc.a isn't really a problem and would make things > simpler, sounds good to me Thanks. Attached is Daniel's patch rebased to current git trunk. I've build glibc on Linux/x86_64 with and without --enable-static-nss. Could someone please apply it? Thanks, -- Paul Pluzhnikov 2012-03-01 Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj@google.com> Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com> [BZ #6528] * grp/Makefile, inet/Makefile, login/Makefile, nscd/Makefile, posix/Makefile, pwd/Makefile, rt/Makefile, sunrpc/Makefile: Do not set otherlibs for static NSS. * nss/Makefile: Likewise. Include libnss_files in libc.a for --enable-static-nss. Remove special case for getent. * resolv/Makefile: Include libnss_dns in libc.a for --enable-static-nss.
Attachment:
glibc-pr6528-20120301.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |