This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Don't always provide definition of gets

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:41:36 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't always provide definition of gets
References: <4F0E9FBA.1030407@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1201242219170.11395@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 17:22, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> I wonder if there should actually be an internal __USE_GETS or similar

Hell, no.  That function must die.  Any work-around like that will
just cause people to use it.

I added a patch.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Don't always provide definition of gets
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- [PATCH] Don't always provide definition of gets
  - From: Marek Polacek
- Re: [PATCH] Don't always provide definition of gets
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]