This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 2.11 branch

From: Petr Baudis <pasky at suse dot cz>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>,GNU libc devel <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:57:38 +0100
Subject: Re: 2.11 branch
References: <4AFC3D6B.40403@redhat.com><20091112203809.GO3708@machine.or.cz><20091112212104.D5D6388D@magilla.sf.frob.com>

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:21:04PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Thanks for the notice; the current consensus seems to be to track this
> > in release/2.11/master, will anyone mind if i push this instead and
> > delete glibc-2.11-branch?
> 
> Yes, please do.
> 
> In future, I think we can have the release branch managers take care of all
> the actual branch-making.  Ulrich can just post that "it's time now" and
> give the commit id that precedes his first trunk-after-release commit.

I think we can just do even that ourselves, using the commit right
before the version.h change to .99 - not sure if there are any cases
where this would be wrong...

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
A lot of people have my books on their bookshelves.
That's the problem, they need to read them. -- Don Knuth

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.11 branch
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- 2.11 branch
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: 2.11 branch
  - From: Petr Baudis
- Re: 2.11 branch
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]