This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: requeue_pi support
- From: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino at in dot ibm dot com>
- To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc at us dot ibm dot com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix dot de>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:43:20 +0530
- Subject: Re: requeue_pi support
- References: <4A63ECB9.9020808@redhat.com> <20090721204002.GA6166@in.ibm.com> <4A6639AB.4010501@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: dino at in dot ibm dot com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:56:59PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > Built and tested the latest glibc git with the prio-wake testcase
> > (Part of the LTP realtime testcases that fails sometimes on SMP without
> > requeue-PI support)
> > 1. 2.6.29.5 - APIs not implemented in kernel, testcase fails sometimes as
> > expected. (ENOSYS for requeue APIs and fails sometimes on
> > SMP as expected)
>
> No idea what's in there. Somebody who has lots of interest will have to
> figure it out.
These are expected results so no need investigate any further
>
> > 2. 2.6.29.5-rt22 - APIs implemented in kernel, testcase passes in a 2 hour run
> > 3. 2.6.31-rc3 - APIs implemented in kernel, testcase passes in a 2 hour run
>
> So this means that the code I committed does work as is?
Yes it does. Though I havent stress tested it so far
-Dinakar