This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Missing <kernel-features.h> includes
> Roland McGrath wrote:
> > and why?
> Because it's unacceptable to require all those unnecessary changes just
> because hurd does something for no reason differently.
That is not an answer to the question I asked. I'm talking about the
comprehensibility of the existing code, not about the Hurd code.
Where does the existing code include kernel-features.h indirectly and why
does it rely on that implicitly?