This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Which will happen if I use different LC_COLLATE version?

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Cc: "Bin Chen" <binary dot chen at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:47:57 -0400
Subject: Re: Which will happen if I use different LC_COLLATE version?
References: <5800c1cc0708250239m4aa18977o2262a821400fc847@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday 25 August 2007, Bin Chen wrote:
> I have a arm board using glibc-2.3.2, now I am going to let it support
> zh_CN.utf-8 locale, so I need to have the LC_* files... Because
> localedef program consumes too much memory so I can't run it in my
> board.
>
> Then I copy all the LC_* files from my PC to arm board. In PC the
> glibc version is 2.4, so the different version cause different magic
> number in the beginning of the file.

failure: the locale files are binary files which need to be generated on your 
arm machine
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which will happen if I use different LC_COLLATE version?
  - From: Bin Chen

References:
- Which will happen if I use different LC_COLLATE version?
  - From: Bin Chen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]