This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Weekly roundup of patches
- From: Tom Gall <tom_gall at vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:59:06 -0600 (CST)
- Subject: Re: Weekly roundup of patches
- References: <20051212114020.B9C7518097C@magilla.sf.frob.com>
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > It's good to have a periodic round up of the current status of pending
> > patches / work of note. It is my goal to follow more or less
> > follow the fine example set down by Andrew Morten from the
> > linux kernel community.
>
> This is a fine thing to do. I'd be very glad if you make this a regular
> weekly habit.
Hi Roland,
Yes I do plan to do this weekly.
> However, please separate the libc-ports issues and post
> about those on libc-ports only. On libc-alpha, post about core libc issues.
> (There is of course no harm in mentioning ports issues' status in your
> posting, but that followup discussion should not be on libc-alpha.)
Ok, shall do! Thanks for the feedback.
> It would be useful to note the BZ# associated with each issue. If there is
> none, then note that so as to encourage people who care about that issue to
> file it in the official tracking system.
Related to this, is this to suggest that my vDSO patch which isn't a bug
but really new function, something that should have a BZ# to accompany the
work?
For some reason (and perhaps incorrectly) I didn't think that BZ was for
new features.
Regards,
Tom