This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking


On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:51:02PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:54:02PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > This discussion is off-topic for the gcc list.  Whether there are problems
> > with glibc or the LSB is a matter for other lists, not for gcc@gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> You are correct, in that this particular complaint is not directly on-topic, 
> and for that I apologize.
> 
> However, IMO the thread is definitely not off topic - my original post was 
> an idea to amend the gcc toolchain to make running two separate glibcs
> in parallel possible. And since glibc and gcc seem to be joined at the hip,
> this is IMO definitely on topic.

If you identify something in gcc that needs to change in gcc to make this
easier, yes.  But it seems to me that the work is all on the glibc end of
things.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]