This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Questions about your long double IEEE double -> quad switch.
- From: Dwayne Grant McConnell <dgm69 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Steve Munroe <sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:02:59 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
- Subject: Re: Questions about your long double IEEE double -> quad switch.
- References: <Pine.WNT.4.61.0410110955490.740@dwayne>
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Dwayne Grant McConnell wrote:
> I have been working on a ppc64 IBM quad long double patch and I'm
> getting ready to start porting my stuff to your patch at
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2004-07/msg00026.html
>
> Are there any changes since then that I need to know about before I start?
>
> Also I see your comments at
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2004-04/msg00013.html
>
> I should be using ldbl-128ibm and ldbl-64-128ibm for the IBM extended long
> double specific code right?
Any thoughts on this topic?
--
Dwayne Grant McConnell <dgm69@us.ibm.com>
Lotus Notes: Dwayne McConnell/Austin/IBM@IBMUS