This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
- From: Denis Zaitsev <zzz at anda dot ru>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com,linux-gcc at vger dot kernel dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 06:38:50 +0500
- Subject: Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
- References: <20031225052045.A18774@zzz.ward.six> <20031225003819.GC13447@redhat.com> <20031225060850.C7419@zzz.ward.six> <20031225012711.GD13447@redhat.com>
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 05:27:11PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:08:50AM +0500, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> > Do you mean a kind of a complain that "X" does't work as it should?
>
> Rather, that it could work better.
Ok. BTW, I was looking around a little - and it seems that "m" suits
better here than "X" - we deals with a memory operand, not with "Any
operand whatsoever" (according to the documentation). But you suggest
"X" (and this is not the first time). Why?