This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Recent binutils releases and linux kernel 2.5.69+
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst dot de>
- To: "ismail (cartman) donmez" <kde at myrealbox dot com>
- Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, linux kernel <linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 11:48:06 +0200
- Subject: Re: Recent binutils releases and linux kernel 2.5.69+
- References: <20030529074448.A29931@lucon.org> <20030529095940.B31904@lucon.org> <20030530084824.GA29758@lst.de> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 12:45:26PM +0300, ismail (cartman) donmez wrote:
> On Friday 30 May 2003 11:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I know. and <linux/sysctl.h> is a kernel header libc shouldn't include.
> > So you want to do something to <sys/sysctl.h>, namely get rid of it's
> > depency on kernel headers.
> Wouldn't this result in glibc-kernel inconsistency in headers?
How so? If the sysctl values change you're screwed anyway.