This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [mips] ABI shouldn't depend on ISA
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com> writes:
> On Mar 25, 2003, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de> wrote:
>
>> I know there weren't comments before for this but can you add them
>> nevertheless?
>
> Err... In what sense would these comments be different from the
> well-known stupid-comment example `i++; /* Increment i. */'? Or do
> you have something more interesting in mind?
It's not obvious to me whether _MIPS_ISA_MIPS32 is defined:
- iff o32 or n32 is used
- only if n32 is in use
I had something like this in mind:
> +#define _MIPS_ISA_MIPS32 6 /* Defined for code that uses o32. */
> +#define _MIPS_ISA_MIPS64 7 /* Defined for code that uses n64. */
Or are my comments wrong? Then you know why they're needed ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj at suse dot de
private aj at arthur dot inka dot de
http://www.suse.de/~aj