This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Is 2.3 really binary compatible?
Greg Schafer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> No prelink here (yet!)
> One thing I have established though is that my static bash binary runs
> fine on a glibc-2.2.92 system.
> So, somewhere between 2.2.92 and 2.2.94, the libnss stuff became incompatible.
93 and 94 even. Here static rpm, vi, glftpd, mldonkey are also segfaulting
and everything started with 94.
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz CS at FoE, Wroclaw University of Technology
email@example.com AM2-6BONE, 1024/3DB19BBD, arekm(at)ircnet, PLD/Linux