This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: HAVE_HIDDEN doesnt always mean DONT_USE_BOOTSTRAP_MAP

From: "Steve Munroe" <sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, geoffk at geoffk dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:03:54 -0500
Subject: Re: HAVE_HIDDEN doesnt always mean DONT_USE_BOOTSTRAP_MAP

> > And how about ./elf/cache.c
>
> That one is just laziness or an oversight.  In fact, I don't think those
> need to be conditional at all.

I removed the conditionals form ./elf/cache.c and built for powerpc64 and
ran make check. It built and ran Ok (except for the usual test-float etc
failures).

Any interrest in a patch the clean this up (with the powerpc64 part of
course)?

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]