This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [wiget@pld.org.pl] libc/3237: symbol __udivdi3, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference


On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 09:48:10AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 01:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 
> > I think each of the problematic platforms should analyze
> > what libgcc symbols shared libraries are reexporting, then can we have
> > exact numbers on how much would it grow glibc (subtracting routines
> > used internally by glibc but not reexported).
> 
> I'm not so much concerned about the size.  What I really don't like is
> duplicating and having to track code from gcc.

All the routines which cause these problems I believe are arithmetic
helpers which won't ever change.
We already have longlong.h in glibc, so the only need is to put in
tiny wrappers around it...

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]