This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Declare wait_node structure volatile

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Brown <bmark at us dot ibm dot com>, libcalpha <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 21 Mar 2002 12:35:04 -0800
Subject: Re: PATCH: Declare wait_node structure volatile
References: <AE06E1AA-3C4A-11D6-98E8-0030657603C6@us.ibm.com> <20020321204602.X32482@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 11:46, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Shouldn't sysdeps/ia64/pt-machine.h instead define a
> MEMORY_BARRIER (to something like:
> __asm__ __volatile__("" : : : "memory");
> )?

This looks more correct.  Though this should probably be the default for
all platforms which don't define specific BARRIER macros.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Declare wait_node structure volatile
  - From: Mark Brown

References:
- PATCH: Declare wait_node structure volatile
  - From: Mark Brown
- Re: PATCH: Declare wait_node structure volatile
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]