This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: PATCH: Add __frame_state_for for gcc 3.0.1
- To: jbuck at synopsys dot com
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Add __frame_state_for for gcc 3.0.1
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 20:23:47 -0700
- CC: jbuck at synopsys dot com, jakub at redhat dot com, hjl at lucon dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200107060243.TAA03052@racerx.synopsys.com>
- Reply-to: Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>
> From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 19:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Cc: jbuck@synopsys.com, jakub@redhat.com, hjl@lucon.org,
> libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
>
> > > From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.COM>
> > > Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 17:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > > Which C libraries in common use have unwinding info?
> >
> > glibc.
>
> Other than glibc, I mean.
>
> We're talking about solving glibc/gcc3 problems by making some
> changes in both, right? The goal is to get a glibc built that works
> with gcc2 or gcc3.
>
> If we can fix everything else, I won't be upset if throwing an exception
> from inside qsort doesn't work for an old glibc.
I thought the problem was with a _new_ glibc, but with old
applications, so that the thing throwing the exception is a callback
which is in an old application, but it tries to throw through the new
glibc's qsort frame.
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>