This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
recommended versions, patches?
- To: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: recommended versions, patches?
- From: "Ken Whaley" <ken at believe dot com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 14:16:46 -0700
I'm trying to normalize the GNU portions of our company's
development environment as much as I can, and as a starting point,
I'm trying to determine what the right versions of GCC and GLIBC are.
I'd like to be using "sanctioned" releases (assuming these are the most
robust, reliable, etc.), and today that points to
gcc 2.95.3 and glibc 2.2.3.
>From threads in this mailing list, it appears that this combination is
a problem, and that at least some patches must be made to gcc 2.95.3
to work with glibc 2.2.3, something about an unversioned atexit symbol.
Is this the only problem with the above combo? Are there other "must
fix" things to get them to work well together?
This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact
the sender and delete all copies.