This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: shared lib problem with atexit
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:54:40AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > That is probably true. However, it does break DSOs compiled against
> > glibc 2.0.x.
> This binary is definitely not linked against glibc 2.0. I don't care
> about non-existing problems. There is so far no reported problem with
> glibc 2.0 binaries so why care?
How long has glibc 2.2.3 been released? I doubt it has been in the
wide use. Why can't we provide a solution for a possible problem
instead of letting people say glibc 2.2.3 breaks their DSOs compiled
against glibc 2.0? We know there is a problem and we can find a
workaround. It is a shame not to prepare for it even if it may not
BTW, the threaded RPC change in glibc 2.2.3 breaks some non-threaded
RPC applications. I have provided a patch for it.