This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
- To: "Gabor Z. Papp" <gzp at papp dot hu>
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.2 in CVS and gcc problem.
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:40:22 -0800
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- References: <20010318223003.A1333@gzp2.gzp.hu> <20010318133852.A25902@lucon.org> <20010318224501.A1094@gzp2.gzp.hu> <20010318164100.A13028@lucon.org> <20010318164805.A22420@lucon.org> <20010319081756.A323@gzp2.gzp.hu>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:17:56AM +0100, Gabor Z. Papp wrote:
> * "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>:
>
> | glibc 2.2 in CVS is not compatible with gcc:
> |
> | http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2001-03/msg00048.html
>
> Yes, this is my error report.
>
> | unless your gcc is built with this patch installed:
> |
> | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg01187.html
>
> This is for which version of gcc?
If you ask me, the current gcc in CVS is broken under Linux. I will
recommend
1. gcc from RedHat Rawhide. Or
2. gcc 2.95.3 + the patch above.
H.J.