This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Subject: Re: __gmon_start__ issues between 2.1.x and 2.2.x on sparc(?)
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: 21 Feb 2001 18:20:58 +0100
- Cc: Philip Blundell <pb at futuretv dot com>,Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>,libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <Your message of "21 Feb 2001 16:07:31 +0100." <ho8zn013d8.fsf@gee.suse.de><5.0.2.1.2.20010221181020.03236ec8@mail.lauterbach.com>
Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:
> At 16:30 21.02.2001, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >In message <ho8zn013d8.fsf@gee.suse.de>, Andreas Jaeger writes:
> > >Is this correct? Anything else I can do to check that binutils are
> > >correct now?
> >
> >If you can invent a self-contained testcase, it would be worth adding to the
> >ld testsuite.
>
> See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-10/msg00056.html
>
> Unfortunately the html version lost the file names of the attachments,
> but you can d/l the mbox formatted archive to get it.
Are you sure the testcase is valid? It fails on sparc - but also on
ia32.
Can you rerun it with "fixed" binutils?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj