This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc2.2 - Failed Assertions after upgrade
>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes:
Uli> "Gerhard de Jager@i-Commerce Services" <Gerhard.deJager@za.didata.com> writes:
>> Could this be a compiler error? (I'm using gcc: egcs 2.91.66 - egcs-1.1.2
>> release)
Uli> The announcement clearly said gcc 2.95.2 should be used.
In that case we should change configure.in and update the
documentation. Here's a patch for configure,
Andreas
2000-11-13 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
* configure.in: Require gcc 2.95 or newer.
============================================================
Index: configure.in
--- configure.in 2000/11/01 16:31:21 1.293
+++ configure.in 2000/11/13 09:39:27
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@
AC_REQUIRE([AC_CHECK_TOOL_PREFIX])dnl
AC_CHECK_PROG_VER(CC, ${ac_tool_prefix}gcc ${ac_tool_prefix}cc, -v,
[version \([egcygnustpi-]*[0-9.]*\)],
- [egcs-2.9[1-9].*|egcs-2.90.2[789]|egcs-2.90.[3-9][0-9]|*gcc-2.9[1-9].*|pgcc-2.90.2[789]|pgcc-2.90.[3-9][0-9]|*2.8.[1-9]*|*2.9|*2.9.[0-9]*|2.9[5-9]*|cygnus-2.9[1-9]*|gcc-2.9[5-9]|gcc-2.1[0-9][0-9]|sgicc-*],
+ [*gcc-2.9[5-9].*|*2.8.[1-9]*|*2.9|*2.9.[0-9]*|2.9[5-9]*|cygnus-2.9[1-9]*|gcc-2.9[5-9]|gcc-2.1[0-9][0-9]|sgicc-*],
critic_missing=t)
AC_CHECK_PROG_VER(MAKE, gnumake gmake make, --version,
[GNU Make[^0-9]*\([0-9][0-9.]*\)],
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj