This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE
- To: Paul Eggert <eggert at twinsun dot com>
- Subject: Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE
- From: Akim Demaille <akim at epita dot fr>
- Date: 01 Aug 2000 21:01:41 +0200
- Cc: haible at ilog dot fr, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, autoconf at gnu dot org
- References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0007261506580.6571-100000@red.csi.cam.ac.uk><m3lmyoamkf.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com><200007262030.NAA15438@ruby.twinsun.com><14719.22225.713527.823418@honolulu.ilog.fr><mv4vgxrx6ki.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><200007271634.JAA08859@green-office.twinsun.com><mv4n1iymwrq.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><14725.40424.405013.773855@honolulu.ilog.fr><mv466pme1pc.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><200007312139.OAA01047@ruby.twinsun.com><mv43dkpnk3p.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr><200008011820.LAA02294@ruby.twinsun.com>
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com> writes:
Paul> Not yet, unfortunately, and partly this is due to inadequate
Paul> research on my part; please see below. (Sorry about that.)
Wow, thanks Paul.
But really, personally, currently I don't have time to devote to
this. 2.50 should be coming though. There are too many open issues.
I am willing to forget about this until 2.50 is out. Then we will
have plenty of time to polish the various compilers' issue (there is
also the issue of input file extensions etc.).
I keep your message preciously.
Paul> + -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 \
Paul> This is just a minor point, but is the "=1" really needed here?
Paul> -Dx is equivalent to -Dx=1 on all compilers that I've ever heard
Paul> of.
I used this to actually have a value to pass to AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED. I
need a value here.