This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [Michael Deutschmann <michael@talamasca.wkpowerlink.com>] libc/1424: llseek symbol is attractive nuisance
- To: "GNU C. library Alpha Tester List" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [Michael Deutschmann <michael@talamasca.wkpowerlink.com>] libc/1424: llseek symbol is attractive nuisance
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Date: 25 Nov 1999 16:34:50 +0100
- Cc: Michael Deutschmann <michael at talamasca dot wkpowerlink dot com>
- References: <u8ogcioh3y.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de>
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
|> What do you think of the appended bug report?
|>
|> Should we remove llseek for glibc 2.2?
-Wimplicit is your friend. There are _many_ other functions in glibc that
are not declared by default (all GNU extensions). A program that compiles
and links successfully is not necessarily correct.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg