This is the mail archive of the
kawa@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Kawa project.
Re: two bugs and a buggy patch
- To: per at bothner dot com
- Subject: Re: two bugs and a buggy patch
- From: Marco Vezzoli <marco dot vezzoli at st dot com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:33:26 +0200
- Cc: VEZZOLI_Marco/italy_agrate1_ag at agx003 dot agr dot st dot com,kawa at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: sgs-thomson
- References: <m2zor1p12h.fsf@kelso.bothner.com>
per@bothner.com wrote:
>
> What do you think about the SRFI-9 Record Type feature
> (http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-9/srfi-9.html)? I would like
> Kawa to implement that.
>
> Or perhaps getting define-class working is more important?
>
I read the SRFI9; I find it really useful.
I tried to use the first two macros with kawa 1.6.66 and they worked
well.
Do you think kawa need some adaptation / optimization of the sample
code?
Or you simply want to add it in the next snapshot?
>
> I agree that is desirable. My main comment is was about freshly
> written code.
>
> When it concerns Slib, my preferred approach is to import useful SLib
> modules into gnu.kawa.slib. This means we can tweak the code so it
> works betters with Kawa. What I do is I first check in to cvs the
> original unmodified version, and then I check in my kawa-modified
> version. That gives us a cvs record of the changes we made. So
> if you're using Slib rb-tree implementation, perhaps we should
> add it to gnu.kawa.slib. Which Slib module is that?
I don't find this module in the SLib release I use at work (2c6);
strangely enough they appear both in the change log and in a patch file
packed in the same tarball.
I attached the files from the distribution I have at home, that is the
one which is distributed with the umb-scheme package for linux.
Marco
--
(--cafe babe--)
Marco Vezzoli marco.vezzoli@st.com
CR&D Intranet Developement STMicroelectronics
tel. +39 039 603 6852 fax. +39 039 603 5055
rbtest.scm
rbtree.scm