This is the mail archive of the firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list for the Kawa project. See the Kawa home page for more information.
At 13:16 15.03.99 -0700, you wrote: >>OTOH, what about aligning this feature with Common Lisp syntax: >> >> (let ((x 10) (y 20) ...) >> (declare (type integer x y) ...) >> ...) > >Please do not do this. Putting the declaration with the variable >makes it easier (to me at least) to manipulate the code. I agree that declarations should be associated with the variable. However, the suggested syntax does not allow a declaration without introducing a new binding. In some cases it is important to be able to add declarations around a form, to say that within this form a variable is known to refer to a more specific type than previously declared. Perhaps we can introduce a declare syntax specifically for this: (let (((a <number>) (read-a-number)) ... ) (if (instanceof? a <integer>) (declare ((a <integer>) ... ) (do-integer-computation) ...) (do-number-computation)) ) Hallvard Trętteberg, Stipendiat ved Institutt for Datateknikk og Informasjonsvitenskap (IDI) Fakultet for Fysikk, Informatikk og Matematikk (FIM) Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet (NTNU) Kontor: F-262, Nye Elektro, Tlf: +47 7359 3443, Fax: +47 7359 4466