This is the mail archive of the
insight@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Insight project.
Re: [patch] configure --without-x should work
- From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
- To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at doctormoo dot dyndns dot org>
- Cc: <insight at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 13:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: [patch] configure --without-x should work
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> --without-x is currently broken (doesn't build), so this is no loss.
Agreed.
> I'd like review from someone who knows something about the whole with-x/
> without-x thing.
I think this is fine. It makes perfect sense. There is only one really,
really, really minor point worth mentioning, though: cygwin. On cygwin, it
is possible to have X but not want to build with it, i.e., use the default
cygwin builds, which link against Microsoft DLL import libraries.
However, I don't think that any of our configure machinery would work in
this case, anyway, so it's still no loss. :-)
Keith