Re: feature?

[Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj at mdj dot nada dot kth dot se>]

Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@mdj.nada.kth.se> writes:

> It should be protected, so this seems to be a newly introduced problem
> concerning GC-protection of the tail-array of a struct.

2000-03-21  Mikael Djurfeldt  <mdj@mdj.nada.kth.se>

	* gc.c (scm_gc_mark): Bugfix 1: The recent SCM_PACK/UNPACK change
	made SCM values into pointers.  This turned an arithmetic
	computation of the address of the vcell into a pointer-arithmetic
	one, thereby screwing up marking of structs.
	Bugfix 2: Removed incompletely introduced loop variable `j' used
	when protecting the tail array of a struct.