Re: Doc Tasks (was RE: docstrings in Guile!)

["Greg J. Badros" <gjb at cs dot washington dot edu>]

Telford Tendys <telford@eng.uts.edu.au> writes:

> > For the record, I think this is a bad idea, but you folks may be more
> > sold on SGML/XML technology after taking a look at some interesting
> > work the Scheme and Lisp community has done that leverages Scheme/Lisp
> > for SGML processing.  If you haven't already, see:
> > 
> > http://www.latte.org/latte.html
> 
> This is not SGML/XML technology! It is a cross between TeX and scheme with
> facilities for HTML as an output. This document makes a point of saying that
> no one would ever want to write (or look at) HTML directly with a text editor.
> I can't help agreeing with them and extending the feeling toward XML too.

I wasn't suggesting we use latte, just that people on the list might be
interested in it as others have suggested rolling our own in a similar
direction.

<snip>

Greg