This is the mail archive of the
guile@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: docstrings in Guile!
Eric Moore <moore@chem.cmu.edu> writes:
> >>>>> "Greg" == Greg J Badros <gjb@cs.washington.edu> writes:
>
> Greg> Daniel Skarda <0rfelyus@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> writes:
> Greg> But that's the point: you don't *have* to rewrite all existing
> Greg> code; it's just a performance optimization to rewrite the
> Greg> existing code, along with a simplification of that code.
>
> Not even much of a performance optimization:
<snip>
> The optimizer optimizes the extra test out anyway :)
Stellar! I was planning on doing this test myself and am thrilled you
beat me to it. I didn't want to overstep my claims before checking, but
this is great news.
I will make this change to the macros and drop the SCM_NIMP tests. I
don't even think there is good cause to define the SCM_SLOPPY_FOOP
tests, but I will if I hear a lot of clamouring supported by evidence.
Thanks, Eric!
Greg