Re: should GOOPS be built-in?

[Klaus Schilling <Klaus dot Schilling at munich dot netsurf dot de>]

Mikael Djurfeldt writes:
 > Lalo Martins <lalo@webcom.com> writes:
 > 
 > > > Nope.  I think it is useful to merge it now.
 > 
 > Maybe I should be a bit clearer: The reason why it's useful is that,
 > as soon as it has been merged (which basically amounts to 1. fixing
 > copyright asigment with Erick, 2. copying the GOOPS file into the
 > distribution, and 3. placing an init call at the appropriate place)
 > work can commence on several things, one being developing a better
 > representation than the structs, and, eventually, replacing them.

Will the future approach still allow to use other object systems, for
example one that could be faked in a perlish style by using the envi-
ronment stuff and environmental symbol delegation?

Klaus Schilling